Learn about personalized and substantive
conflict situations and how to do conflict resolution
Conflict & Cooperation In The Workplace by Robert
Bacal
Summary: The best way to handle workplace conflict
depends on the kind of conflict, and there ARE various
kinds. In this article you will learn the different
between personalized conflict (often called personality
conflict), and substantive conflict (conflict over
real issues).
One topic that is of interest to most people in the
workplace is conflict; how it works, how to avoid
it, and how to deal with it when it occurs. It is
indeed the rare organization that doesn't have to
face the issue of conflict, and how to harness it
so that it produces positive results rather than destruction.
In this article, we are going to look at some important
elements of conflict, how it escalates over time, and suggest
a few general strategies for dealing with it.
Two Types of Conflict
In the workplace (and almost any setting), you are likely
to find two forms of conflict. The first is conflict about
decisions, ideas, directions and actions. We will call this
"substantive conflict" since it deals with disagreements
about the substance of issues. The second form, "personalized
conflict" is often called a personality conflict. In this
form, the two parties simply "don't like each other much".
Substantive Conflict
Substantive conflict can occur on just about any issue,
but its moving force is that the two parties simply disagree
about an issue. This can be a good thing or a bad thing.
Handled correctly parties in conflict can create, for themselves
and those around them, the ability to resolve an issue with
something creative, something better than either party's
original position. Let's look at an example.
A branch manager and a staff member are in conflict over
work hours. The branch manager expects all staff to work
standard hours, beginning at 8:00 am so that the public
will receive service starting first thing in the morning.
The staff member wants to begin work at 9:00 am, because
he has child careresponsibilities. On several occasions
the staff member has arrived late, which makes it appear
to the manager that the employee is being deliberately unwilling
to follow the rules.
Rather than the situation deteriorating, the parties approach
the situation, not as one that should be won, but with an
eye on solving a problem. After discussing the situation,
(and understanding each other's needs), they realize that
a) almost no customers call in the early morning b) the
few that do can be handled by other staff who like to be
in at 8:00, and b) there are more customers calling in between
4:00 and 5:00 pm. The parties agree that it makes sense
to modify work hours. The result: a happier employee and
better service.
The benefits would never have occurred if this conflict
hadn't occurred, or if either party played the situation
as if it was a game to be one by one person or the other.
(Did anybody really lose in this situation?).
Personalized Conflict
While substantive conflict, if handled correctly, can be
very productive, personalized conflict is almost never a
good thing. There are several reasons. First personalized
conflict is fuelled primarily by emotion (usually anger,
frustration) and perceptions about someone else's personality,
character or motives. When conflict is personalized and
extreme each party acts as if the other is suspect as a
person. Second, because personalized conflict is about emotion
and not issues, problem solving almost never works, because
neither party is really interested in solving a problem...in
fact, in extreme cases, the parties go out of their ways
to create new ones, imagined or real. Third, personalized
conflicts almost always get worse over time, if they cannot
be converted to substantive conflict. That is because each
person expects problems, looks for them, finds them, and
gets angrier.
Let's look at the previous example but change the way the
situation was handled.
When the branch manager approached the staff member about
the tardiness, he showed his irritation plainly. The staff
member, already feeling under the gun, felt that the manager
was being unfair, and accusatory, and became defensive.
This, in turn, resulted in the manager "laying down the
law", andthat was how the situation was left. After the
discussion, the manager felt the employee was lazy and making
excuses, while the employee felt the boss was out to get
him.
Stop Creating Conflict
It's better to prevent unnecessary conflict than to manage conflict once
the flames have started. Click
here to preview Conflict Prevention In The Workplace - Using Cooperative
Communication
Not surprisingly, the situation got worse. Even when
the staff member was a few minutes late, for good
reason, the boss jumped on him like a "ton of bricks".
The employee, angered and frustrated, started taking
longer coffee breaks and was away "sick" more frequently.
The situation became increasingly polarized, with
other people being sucked in, and taking sides, privately.
Oddly enough, the initial perceptions of both bossand employee
became the truth. After a while the boss acted as if he
was out to get the employee, and the employee acted as if
he was lazy and uncaring. The original issue was all but
forgotten, as the parties developed an intense dislike of
each other.
If you enjoy this article
and wish to learn more about cooperative communication
be sure to check out our quick read book called
"Conflict Prevention In the Workplace -
Using Cooperative Communication" by clicking
here
Solution Strategies
Identification
When involved in a conflict situation, it is important
that you are aware of whether you and the other party are
dealing with a substantive conflict or a personalized one.
It isn't always easy to tell them apart, and it is difficult
to look honestly at oneself. Ask yourself the following
questions:
Do I dislike the other person or get frustrated with
him/her?
Do I see the other person as untrustworthy, and undeserving
of respect?
Is my emotional reaction to the conflict appropriate
to it's seriousness or lack thereof?
Do I really want to "win"?
If the answer to any of these question is yes, you may
be setting yourself up for a personalized conflict that
nobody can win in the long term.
With respect to the other person, one good indicator of
a personalized conflict situation is that the person will
try to counter your substantive point on the issue with
a series of DIFFERENT reasons why you are wrong. For example,
let's look at the following dialogue.
Manager: We can't have you come in at 9:00 am because we
need to answer the phones.
Employee: That makes sense, but I checked and we get only
one or two calls between 8:00 and 9:00 but we get between
ten and twenty calls in the later afternoon.
Manager: Well, maybe, but if you come in later, then soon
everyone else will want to...
Note that in this case, the manager isn't really problem
solving, but trying to find reasons to refuse the request,
either because he doesn't "like" the other person, or for
some other emotional reason we don't know about.
Move To Substantive Issues
Even in situations where both you and the other party have
personalized the conflict, you can work to focus on specific
issues. You have not direct control over another person,
but you have control over yourself. By moving to the issues,
and staying there, you will also encourage the other person
to do so.
Stop Letting
Conflict Control YOU
Learn to manage conflict by "using your head",
rather than your heart. Find out about pro's and con's of different conflict
methods. Click
here to preview Using Your Head to Manage Conflict Helpcard.
It isn't easy, of course. The trick is to try to
put aside your negative perceptions about the other
person, and not to dwell on them. That's an internal
thing. Every time you think to yourself "what an idiot"(or
all the other negative things), you make it that more
difficult to stay focused on problem- solving, rather
than winning, or getting your own way.
Work To Prevent Personalization
It is rare that personalization occurs just on the basis
of two incompatible personalities. Usually, personalization
occurs because conflict on substantive issues is handled
badly. That is, one or both parties behaves in non-cooperative
ways.
An Innovative Approach To Conflict!
Conflict
Prevention In The Workplace - Using Cooperative Communication
is one of the few books that explains how to prevent
conflict rather than manage it. Learn how to modify
what and how you communicate to reduce unnecessary personality
conflicts. Available in print or electronic format you
can preview or get more information by clicking
here.
Learn
To Use Your Head When Dealing With Conflict
The
choices you make when involved in conflict determine
whether good comes from it or bad. Using Your Head
to Manage Conflict Helpcard explains your various
conflict management options, and when to use each
one.
Stop
reacting and start thinking and making the right conflict
management decisions.