Understanding
language and communication - meaningless utterances
Applying Bacal's Law of Meaningless Utterances
By Robert Bacal, October, 2002
People say all sorts of things, and make all
kinds of statements. Some of those are very meaningful,
even profound and worth paying attention to. But a good
percentage of what people say and write actually have no
meaning whatsoever. Here's an example. Tom is known to champion
various positions and he says: "I am strongly in
favor of individual rights and people taking responsibility".
It may seem, at first glance, that this declaration
tells you a lot about Tom's position. It doesn't really
since it is so vague and general that it conveys almost
NO content, no information about what Tom really believes
and how he will behave. Conversations that follow such statements
are generally wastes of time, as people act as if the sentence
actually does have meaning. The conversation goes off track
immediately unless clarification occurs from square one.
Meaningless utterances are part of normal
human interaction. Still, it's good to understand when utterances
have real meaning, and when they don't. Being able to distinguish
between the meaningless and the meaningful can help us decide
whether to enter into the discussion, or ask for clarification
before continuing.
When Do Meaningless Utterances Occur
They occur during many kinds of conversation.
In social conversation (interaction where the actual information
exchanged isn't important), they serve to oil the wheels
of conversation, particularly between strangers. In that
context they serve some very practical and social functions.
They also occur in conversations that are highly charged
or when one person has some sort of agenda that lies below
the surface. The purpose of meaningless utterances is to
convince, batter, or otherwise confuse people, when they
occur in these emotional contexts.
So, how can you determine whether what someone
says has any meaning at all or is just thrown in there for
effect? You can apply Bacal's Law of Meaningless Utterances.
Bacal's Law of Meaningless Utterances
An utterance (what is spoken or written)
is relatively meaningless if its opposite is impossible,
nonsensical or otherwise ridiculous, subject to context.
Let's go back to Tom's statement: "I
am strongly in favor of individual rights and people taking
responsibility". Can we apply Bacal's Law of Meaningless
Utterances to determine whether this statement means anything?
Sure. What we do is we negate it. So we then get:
I am strongly against individual rights
and believe people should NOT take responsibility for anything.
Now that we've negated the statement, we evaluate
whether a normal, sane and rational person would say something
like this. If you can't imagine anyone (or most normal people)
supporting the negation, then the initial statement is meaningless.
Here's another example. At a party someone
comes up and says to you: "The sky isn't very green
today, is it?" This one's easy because the meaninglessness
of this statement is so obvious that you don't have to apply
Bacal's Law of Meaningless Utterances to determine that
its nonsense. But it's a good example. So, let's negate
it.
The sky sure is green today, isn't
it?
Stop Creating Conflict
It's better to prevent unnecessary conflict than to manage conflict once
the flames have started. Click
here to preview Conflict Prevention In The Workplace - Using Cooperative
Communication
Subject to odd atmospherics, the revised
comment above doesn't make any sense because sky's
aren't green. So we determine that if the negation
makes no sense, the initial assertion makes no sense.
Applications
So what's the use of this law? I can share
how I use it.
First, someone using these over and over again
in conversations is not likely to be willing or able to
conduct a true dialogue about the specific issues. They
may not be willing -- or interested in discussion, but probably
have an agenda to convince you of their position. They may
not be able to conduct a useful discussion on the issue
because they have an opinion without really have a grasp
of the issues that should underlie that opinion.
So, when I see meaningless utterances (mainly
on email discussion lists but it can be used this way anywhere),
I know that it's going to be a waste of my time to enter
into the discussion.
Second, when I see meaningless utterances,
and I really care about the other person, I will clarify
the meaning of the utterance to see if there might be meaning
but it hasn't yet been presented. The reason this is useful
is that because the initial statement lacks meaning, I,
as the communication partner, will probably project MY meaning
on the statement. MY meaning may have no correlation to
the meaning intended by the initial speaker. So, if I want
a meaningful dialogue with someone, I may need to clarify
to tease out that meaning.
Finally, applying this rule can help you with
your BS detector. If a statement appears to have no meaning,
then you have to ask what the speaker is trying to accomplish
in making a meaningless statement. That can lead you to
the hidden agenda of the person involved or as important,
help you conclude the person really doesn't know what s/he's
talking about.
Stop Letting
Conflict Control YOU
Learn to manage conflict by "using your head",
rather than your heart. Find out about pro's and con's of different conflict
methods. Click
here to preview Using Your Head to Manage Conflict Helpcard.
Conclusion
You can apply this law to all sorts of things.
Of course like many things, it's not an absolute, but it's
a useful tool to push your understanding of other people
and what they are trying to accomplish with what they say
and write.
If you find this interesting you might
want to check out some of the other material produced by
Bacal & Associates, related to communication and conflict
at:
Conflict
Prevention In The Workplace - Using Cooperative Communication
is one of the few books that explains how to prevent
conflict rather than manage it. Learn how to modify
what and how you communicate to reduce unnecessary personality
conflicts. Available in print or electronic format you
can preview or get more information by clicking
here.
Learn
To Use Your Head When Dealing With Conflict
The
choices you make when involved in conflict determine
whether good comes from it or bad. Using Your Head
to Manage Conflict Helpcard explains your various
conflict management options, and when to use each
one.
Stop
reacting and start thinking and making the right conflict
management decisions.